JBS News

It's your right to be informed!

Another Bank Bailout – MY COMMENT

| 1 Comment

by John Brian Shannon

MY COMMENT ON PROFESSOR PAUL KRUGMAN’S ARTICLE BEGINS…

The great sucking sound that everyone is hearing these days is the sound of capital leaving the Western economies by the billions – perhaps trillions of dollars – over the past few decades.

Money goes where the investments pay the best returns – and these days that means the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India and China) and other rapidly developing economies. As uncountable billions leave the Western economies, the jobs attached to those mega-billions go with them. Is it any wonder then, that some of the weaker Western economies have been in free-fall for some time? No, it is not.

A great deal of lamenting has been gone on in recent months – but the geomacro-economy has been changing and will continue to change as it reflects the new and evolving reality, for one simple reason – “If we continue to do what we have been doing, we can continue to expect the same results.”

And what is that result, exactly?

I quote Professor Paul Krugman – arguably the leading economist alive today: “An old routine plays out in Spain, with the banks getting help while the unemployed continue to suffer.” Read Professor Krugman’s excellent article here…

Bought anything lately that ISN’T Made in China? Clothing labels or manufacturing stampings could also read Made in India, Indonesia, or any number of other fast-growing economies.

Our consumers demand lower-priced goods and services, so foreign nations have gratefully fulfilled those requirements – effectively transferring Western wealth to third-world nations in huge, glorious gobs of U.S. and European bank notes!

It is said in China these days that one must watch the sky carefully for all the Manna falling from Heaven – which is falling in the form of chunks of gold large enough to take out entire city blocks!

Lest you think this is a recent development, it all started in earnest about 1973 shortly before the Arab Oil Embargo, when oil prices suddenly shot up and Detroit’s thunderous, but thrilling V8′s became unaffordable for millions of workers in nations used to interstate highways serving distant suburbs, spirited driving on the autobahn, and long summer vacations involving hundreds of miles of travel.

Japan at the time and still to this day, exports huge numbers of cars to the West and enjoys a growing market share of (mostly) fuel-efficient vehicles – and the ones that can’t boast good fuel economy, can certainly brag about outstanding reliability and brand-loyalty.

Since the 1990′s, South Korea, China, Indonesia, India and others have also stepped up to fulfill the wants and needs of American and European consumers with everything from home appliances and personal electronics, to tools, clothing and just about anything else you might purchase. Lower labour rates and production costs in Japan, then Korea and now, China, India and Indonesia, allowed more R&D spending, better products and lower prices for consumers and business alike.

Of course, those are all great things. It has been a decades-long bonanza for consumers, businesses and even the governments of the Western world are able to lower their costs by purchasing cheaper and often, more reliable goods from Asia.

American and European corporations have gladly followed this trend and contributed mightily to those developing nations attempting to service the wants and needs of Western consumers. If you doubt me on this – just do a Google search on Apple Computer for just one of many examples of U.S. companies which have elected to have their goods manufactured in China or other rapidly growing nations, instead of the U.S. Check Apple’s stock price in 1990 (mostly U.S. production) vs 2011 (mostly Chinese production). Impressive by any standard but not unusual, in fact, this Western-inspired trend is well established and continues to this day.

One day soon, there will be no manufacturing capacity in the U.S., Canada or Europe. It is dramatically cheaper to have it all done inside the BRIC countries and export those products to the West. Costs are so low, that shipping millions of products thousands of miles across entire oceans, becomes a tiny factor of the final price paid at U.S. or European cash-registers.

The “real price” of that huge manufacturing shift continues to play out in the daily media – higher Western unemployment rates, longer welfare rolls, lower domestic production, real-estate bubbles, bank failures, bank bailouts and so far, about one decade of destroyed dreams for families and small businesses.

But, man, did I get a great deal at the mall today!

Follow John Brian Shannon on Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/JBSCanada

This gallery contains 0 photos

Biofuel a Win-Win: Green and Cost-Effective – response to comment against my Huff Post blog

| Leave a comment

My article appeared in The Huffington Post Canada Feb 2/12

A comment appeared detracting from my points, this is my response to that commentator.

———————————————————————–

I did address both your concerns right in my article.

1) It is important to grow biofuel crops in NON-food growing areas.

Fortunatel­y, the biofuel crops I mentioned grow in areas with poor soil, blistering heat and require very minimal pesticide use – the exact opposite of food crops!

Desolate “junk land” where food crops could NOT be grown anyway, is often considered desirable land to grow Jatropha biofuel, for example.

Therefore, growing the right biofuel crops won’t displace food crop land – notice that was item #1 in my blog.

2) Your second point is completely off.

Rainforest land HAS been demolished to grow sugarcane for both biofuel & food use in Brazil. Sugar cane is NOT the best biofuel, nor are Brazil’s environmen­tal practices.

Just because Brazil isn’t a good example, is that reason enough to write off an entire industry? Just because the Taliban uses guns improperly­, is that a good enough reason to write off the whole gun industry? No guns for our police, our army, etc…?

Separate from Brazil: If 1000 hectares of “junk land” is cleared of its vegetation (if any) and Jatropha is planted there instead, it is still 1000 hectares of green plants which capture and use CO2 from the air!

Far from carbon negative, Jatropha plantation­s take bare, or sparsely vegetated land and turn it into a forest!

Please visit these links:
http://www­.biofuelin­vestments.­net/jatrop­ha.php
http://www­.biofuelin­vestments.­net/millet­tia.php

The only way to overcome the flood of misinforma­tion surroundin­g the entire biofuels debate is to become fully informed by employing research.

johnbrianshannon@gmail.com

This gallery contains 0 photos

Why biofuels are not a good idea – by Ugo Bardi — MY COMMENT

| Leave a comment

My comment on an article by: Ugo Bardi

The article appears in: Energybulletin.net

http://energybulletin.net/stories/2012-01-14/why-biofuels-are-not-good-idea

———————————————————————————————————-

The article I am commenting to is a book review about a book which is strongly against bio-fuels.

1) Most bio-fuel crops need plenty of water – therefore, grow them in Indonesia or other near rainforest-like climates. NOT in the US where food crops are grown.

2) A lot depends on the bio-fuel crop you grow. Here is a link for investors to make good returns on investing in bio-fuel.  http://www.biofuelinvestments.net/

3) Why is the entire premise of the book (seemingly) that bio-fuels MUST replace ALL conventional petroleum. It can be a part of the solution but not all of the solution.

4) Bio-fuels can provide work for farm labourers, income for farmers, contribute to third-world GDP (assuming required rainfall/climate exists in that country), and lower demand on proved oil reserves.

5) A low level of infrastructure is required to grow, harvest and process bio-fuels.

6) Plant-based fuels are an excellent feedstock for the conventional petroleum industry, as they can fill voids in the marketplace and across the board – all plant-based fuels are much lower in carbon content and thereby lower CO2 and other emissions dramatically – and even when blended 50/50 with conventional petroleum fuels, significantly lower CO2 emissions.

It’s too bad you ran into a shark. Many bio-fuel advocates and bio-fuel disputer’s are actually quite scholarly.

The entire bio-fuel discussion is still in it’s early stages, it will only get better from here!

johnbrianshannon@gmail.com

This gallery contains 0 photos

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 202 other followers