The Donald. Unloved?

by John Brian Shannon

I happen to like Donald Trump. There is no doubt about his business acumen, his commitment to his family and his showmanship — and he articulates his thoughts very well.

As I was visiting the Twitterverse today looking for non-Olympics-related tweets or other newsworthy articles that I might like to read, I came across this tweet, apparently from ‘The Donald’ himself:

“I have founded and run one of the largest real estate empires in the world. I employ thousands of people. Why am I the enemy?” @realDonaldTrump 11:42 AM – 7 Aug 12 via web

Right off the bat, let’s agree that Donald Trump has founded and run one of the largest real estate empires in the world and employs thousands of people. I could now quote many articles and offer you a magnificent list of his worldwide properties and portray his wealth in many other ways. Which would take days to read. Zzzz.

Just for fun — after reading my short post, please take a look at the Donald J. Trump Wikipedia site. Many serious journalists do not like Wikipedia because they feel it is not an authoritative source for information (and good heavens — commoners can edit the articles there!) But if you look carefully at the bottom of the Wikipedia page, you can click on the links to the same Bibliography and Reference sources that real journalists use. Check out Donald J. Trump at Wikipedia here…

So the problem is not proving that Donald Trump is a billionaire, nor that he has sound business management and media qualities – all of it is easily proved by looking at his outstanding record of success. Oh yes, many people got exposed to a rapidly-changing real estate market years ago and Mr. Trump was one of those people. Notice that he came back stronger than ever?

“Why am I the enemy?” – Donald J. Trump

Human psychology is a funny thing. It makes us act in irrational ways and say odd things. It is not necessarily logical.

A good example of human psychology occurs when one person in a typical suburban neighbourhood purchases a brand-new Ferrari and drives it every day. Past all of those people who don’t have one.

About one-third of them will congratulate the happy owner on his new purchase, another one-third won’t care either way and the last third will begin hating that owner more powerfully each and every day they can see or hear that new Ferrari.

Why? Because it makes some people ultra-sensitive to the fact they haven’t got a new Ferrari and they start to realize that they are ‘missing out’. Which brings to the forefront of their consciousness that they may (or may not) have made some mistakes along the road of life and though at one time they were on-track to buy one, they cannot now buy one. Or, through no fault of their own, they just don’t make enough money to afford one and never will. Maybe they paid for their nephew’s cancer treatments with their life-savings, or something.

The point is, Mr. Trump can afford to drive a different Ferrari every day of the week – and you can’t. Which causes some people to become angry and to feel hostility towards anyone who is so obviously enjoying their success.

It is simply and profoundly, human nature at work. Is it irrational? Yes. Is it illogical? You bet. But it is human.

What would be better? Ferrari’s for everyone! Woo-Hoo! Yes, that would work… wouldn’t it? Unaffordable, but such great fun.

Much better, would be an education system which gives all students the tools to succeed at life, to weather storms and to overcome any obstacles on their way to becoming wealthy citizens themselves — contributing to our society. Let me put it plainly. Rather than continue to produce high school grads programmed to not succeed in some areas of their life, why not incorporate a sound business/financial education into the primary and high school curriculum geared towards personal financial success?

Instead of getting angry at the very wealthy, why don’t we begin educating 100% of our youth for an entire lifetime of financial success.

At this point, anything would be better than the large numbers of professional haters, people who hate successful individuals and their corporations. You know, those individuals who create jobs, add to the GDP of the nation and which help the government to counteract wealthy individuals and corporations from other parts of the world – ones definitely not benign to our Western way of life.

A nation of envious haters will not succeed. A nation of citizens properly educated and motivated for personal financial success, will!

John Brian Shannon


I write about green energy, sustainable development and economics. My blogs appear in the Arabian Gazette, EcoPoint, EnergyBoom, Huffington Post, United Nations Development Programme, WACSI — and other quality publications.

“It is important to assist all levels of government and the business community to find sustainable ways forward for industry and consumers.”

Green Energy blog:
Economics blog:
Twitter: @JBSCanada

Communist Price — or Western Value?

by John Brian Shannon

Hey, stop, what’s that sound? Take a look around. Is everyone driving the cheapest car or carrying the cheapest handbags?

Hell no!

And why is that, exactly? Why isn’t everyone driving the latest Chery car — which is an extremely affordable car built in communist China? Or, why isn’t everyone buying the blue communist party uniforms made from a long-wearing material that will stand up to the elements for decades? Why are people all over the world buying expensive cars, handbags, jewellery and electronics, just for a few examples?

The reason is; There are effectively, only two kinds of markets in the world. Upmarket and downmarket and there are legitimate reasons for the existence of both markets.

On the one hand, you have upmarket goods and services, which have traditionally been the preserve of the rich Western nations along with an entire middle class in the West able to well-afford those upmarket goods and services. How convenient!

Could it have been planned this way? Why yes, it was. It has been the economic miracle of recorded history.

On the other hand, downmarket goods and services which have traditionally been manufactured and sold in the developing world — are priced according to local market conditions there. Very convenient for the developing world.

Since the industrial revolution, this is how the marketplace has worked. Upmarket goods were manufactured and sold in wealthy Western countries and downmarket goods were manufactured and sold in poorer countries.

Until now.

Suddenly, many upmarket goods are being manufactured in developing nations and a small but growing percentage are being purchased in developing nations.

The West used to own this part of the market, but for the first time since the Industrial Revolution, the East is increasing it’s ownership of this formerly Western-only marketplace. At the same time, the downmarket goods and services haven’t gone anywhere and are still being manufactured by and sold in the developing nations.

Translating into ‘a loss for the West’ if you see things through the Western prism. If you see things through the Eastern prism, you might call it, ‘Advantage East’ or something like that. I call it something else, but more later.

Let me speak clearly on the situation the West now finds itself in; When you haven’t manufactured downmarket products in the first place, but then relatively suddenly, you lose fully half of your upmarket manufacturing to the developing world — that can only be called a paradigm shift in the marketplace.

Some Western politicians, corporations and junior economists have looked at this and in a panic, have announced that we must lower our costs — to match our competitors costs in the developing world! And, either by lack of action, or by actively supporting this line of thought, they have allowed this trend to continue in the Western nations and over time the problem has become much worse. Unwitting traitors, all.

Wages, benefits, unions, workers, unemployment, health care, retirement age, the housing market, traditional Western upmarket manufacturers — all these have felt the winds of change blowing in from the developing nations. It’s a race to the bottom.

“We must compete with China, we must match their labour rates, lower our social entitlements, we must lessen our national infrastructure spending — otherwise we will be beaten in the international marketplace by countries which already have those lower costs built right into their economy” — or so the thinking goes.

Which is wrong.

Rather than call this new paradigm, ‘Advantage East’ or ‘Loss to the West’ — I call it what it really is, ‘Opportunity Knocks‘ for that is what it is. The shift in the world economy is not a time to recoil in horror and then race to the bottom to try to match our competitors costs.

It is a time to do what we do best. It is a time to do what we do better than any other nation or bloc of nations. It is time to remember what has made us great since the beginning of the industrial revolution — and profoundly, do more of it.

If the great wisdom says that we must win, or at least compete in the great race to the bottom by lowering our labour and other costs and manufacture products of lesser quality, why aren’t we all driving Chery cars and buying no-name handbags?

Why are car companies like GM, Ford, Mercedes, BMW, Land Rover, Toyota, Lexus, Infiniti and the like, selling at near-record volumes and recording great profits? Why are Chanel, Louis Vuitton, lululemon and many others selling their wares at good volumes and profits?

Value vs. price.

In the race to the bottom, the only thing that matters is price. Price of labour, materials, production line, merchandising and profit. Price, price price, comrades!

If price was all that mattered, wouldn’t we all be driving cars built by China’s Chery Motors, or India’s Tata Motors? But, we’re not. And that is not to knock those cars — as I said above, there is a legitimate market for BMW’s, just as there is a legitimate market for economically-priced cars.

If price was all that mattered, we would all wear the blue communist party uniforms, which cost the equivalent of $2.00 U.S. dollars. But, we don’t. Many of us in the West think nothing of walking out of the mall with a $60.00 pair of jeans, or a $100.00 pair of dress shoes. Why? The ‘price-only mindset’ says it is illogical to spend money on clothes.

But we do, because we know the value, of, well, value. If you are fortunate enough to own a Toyota or a Mercedes, you know that you enjoy the ownership experience of a quality vehicle, that you will be well-protected in case of a crash, it will last a long time (assuming you do the proper maintenance) and you can in good conscience, gift it to one of your kids after they graduate and know that they will have a safe, reliable car to drive to college and it will still be in great condition many years later.

Why do many women buy a Louis Vuitton handbag? Why not a purchase based on price alone? Well, I can’t answer that question for you. But, I notice those bags continue to be very popular and it is the rare woman in this part of the world that doesn’t have at least one. It is completely illogical from the ‘price-only’ perspective.

Which is my entire point. The price of something is just the price. Anybody with any disposable income will always opt for a better-quality ownership experience and will pay more for a better quality product  and sometimes, much more!

Which proves it’s not about price. It’s about value for money. So, let’s stop trying to compete on price.

Our economists must convince government policymakers of that fact. We need to stop trying to out-compete the communist system and their communist-priced products. It is a battle we will lose every time, for they have already won that battle. The  downmarket was always theirs. It is a state-subsidized market. We can’t compete in that low-profit world, unless we merge our corporations with our government to create our own communist state. Not many takers on that idea, I’ll bet. Goodbye Louis Vuitton — goodbye Mercedes!

We need to compete on what we do best. And why not? The statists compete on what they do best.

Here in the West, we build quality. It costs a little more. Our products have something intangible, something that will convince people to pay more — and that intangible is called value. This is what we do best, so let us return to compete on what we do best. We not only build products — we build value.

Let’s not race to the bottom trying to beat state-subsidized companies. We can’t win there. Rather, let’s create products with value, not only for Western consumers — but for a huge, new and growing middle class with real disposable incomes — the (conceivably) five billion (non-Western) consumers in the developing world, many of whom are approaching middle class status in their respective countries.

And, lets keep the manufacturing of our value products here, to provide jobs to Western citizens — so that the West can continue to have a middle class too!


John Brian Shannon writes about green energy, sustainable development and economics from British Columbia, Canada. His articles appear in the Arabian Gazette, EcoPoint Asia, EnergyBoom, the Huffington Post, the United Nations Development Programme – and other quality publications.

John believes it is important to assist all levels of government and the business community to find sustainable ways forward for industry and consumers.

Check out his personal blog at:
Check out his economics blog at:
Follow John on Twitter:!/JBSCanada